At the England T20 match last Friday, no one was very pleased with the situation when Shivam Dube had an outstanding impact on the game, at Pune. In the fourth T20I competition, Dube was replaced after a concussion substitute was made, which was controversial for England’s captain Jos Buttler. The Dube sub made an impactful shift in the game as well.
- Virat Kohli requests chilli paneer for lunch on Ranji Trophy return
- No opening ceremony for CT; Rohit need not go to Pakistan
- Virat Kohli is in my team: Navdeep Saini of Delhi avoids the 4th stump line query.
- Ricky Ponting passes massive verdict on Steve Smith vs Virat Kohli debate, names ‘Top Best of his generation’
- Lionel Messi Vs Lamine Yamal debate: Barcelona star midfielder offers his opinion on the comparison
- England’s Precise Bowling Performance keeps the series Alive
- India Hopes to Win the Series in Rajkot in a Potential run-fest
- The West Indies’ first victory in Pakistan in thirty-four years is powered by a warrican fifer
- Kohli heads to Delhi for Ranji game after training with Bangar in Alibaug
”Either Harshit has improved his batting or sporting up 25 mph with the ball,’’ Buttler shouted from the side’interchange replacement does not make sense to me, even if it was done for fair play reasons. We, however, see things differently as I think what matters is we should have won such a game.’ The incongruity highlighted the stronger narrative as of the Indian cricketing line and makeup with Wankhede’s fifty more violations on Sunday. But since it won 3-1 in the series as they decided to ignore etiquette.
In the end, Dube’s 53 would remain not out for the last ball of the innings when the Indian side was bowled out. With the Indian side crumbling, Dube, who batted at 6, scored a combination of runs, receiving a knock to his helmet in the process. When it was time for India to field, Rana was brought in for Dube and Akeel said that he had a few concerns.
“Buttler had concerns about the lack of proper communication around the issue. As I walked on the field, there was no interaction whatsoever. To be quite frank, when I showed up to bat, the first thing that came to mind was who Dube was concussed for. To my surprise, he was indeed the replacement and yes, it raised quite the disputes for me because there is no logical reasoning behind this type of substitution. There was communication from their side that the match referee had concluded that statement and so we were not involved in the process at all. I suppose there are a few things we need to ask over to Javagal Srinath [the match referee] for in order to have the doubts settled too.”
The ICC regulations state that the substitution for injury must be authorized by the match referee. In most cases, it will not be a dramatic change, and the substitution should be easy to guess. The rule states that “if the ICC Match Referee has strong reservations that the selected Concussion Replacement will be overly advantageous towards their conjoined team while attending to his/her regularly allocated responsibilities, the ICC Match Referee may impose such conditions upon the identity and involvement of the Concussion Replacement as he/she sees fit, in relation to such aim of replacing the concussed player on necessary basis.”
In the context of whether it was or was not the same, the question of inclusion was raised. Left-handed Dube and his counterpart, Rana, is a right-handed batter. All the same, Rana and Dube bowl with their right hands. But the English camp believes that the decision was very favorable to India because “no, there was no agreement strategy in the game, or anybody consulted us on that or anything. It’s not the complete reason for the defeat in that game and we had opportunities in that match, which were possible, so we had won, but yes, I just have to cleave to the little of that around there,” he grumbled. For more update regarding Cricket Follow Laserbook
‘There was no question worded in that direction on the matter of the post-match presentation. It is common agreement in the commentary box that the English management would have been justified in feeling annoyed. This looked like one of the impact player rules of the IPL, where teams have 12 players on the field,’ he elaborated. ‘Guess, I will also say at the next toss we are going to play 12,’ uttered the Buttler in a slightly humorous manner. Nevertheless, he appeared very displeased and angry talking to the press after the match. 1xbetfair provide the cricket update and if you want to Read more about this click here
People Also Search For:
Cricket ID Provider | Cricket ID | Get Cricket ID | Get ID | Best Cricket ID | Best Cricket ID provider | Get Cricket ID Provider | Betting ID Provider | IPL Betting ID | Betting ID | Online Betting ID | Get Cricket ID | Online Cricket ID Provider | Best Online Cricket ID Provider | Get Cricket ID Provider | Online Cricket Betting ID | Cricket Betting ID